Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required

La Porn Revolution: The Filthy Sex Propaganda That Destroyed Marie Antoinette

Share this:

 This one depicts Marie Antoinette and General Lafayette

This one depicts Marie Antoinette and General Lafayette

 

Can pornography work as social commentary and satire? Can porn be a catalyst for change? In the lead up to the French Revolution, Marie Antoinette was the subject of sexual fantasy brought to the masses in ribald pamphlets.

 

he frontispiece of ‘The Austrian Bitch and the Royal Orgy’, a 1789 opera (via)

The frontispiece of ‘The Austrian Bitch and the Royal Orgy’, a 1789 opera (via)

 

The anti-aristocrat novel Les Amours de Charlot et Toinette (1779) was based on the supposed secret life of Marie, depicted as a wanton hussy unsatisfied by her pasionless, impotent husband, King Louis XVI. In it the king’s penis is “no bigger than a straw/ always limp and always curved/ he has no prick, except in his pocket/ instead of fucking, he is fucked.”  Other tales intended to undermine the Ancien Régime included: The Royal G. (1789) and L’Autrichienne en Goguettes ou l’Orgie Royale (‘The Austrian bitch and her Friends in the Royal Orgy’ .

 

A despondent Marie Antionette waves away a flaccid Louis XVI.

A despondent Marie Antionette waves away a flaccid Louis XVI.

 

In a contemporary pamphlet entitled Vie de Marie-Antoinete d’Autriche, it is written:

“Since the Revolution, the monarchist club, whose body and soul is Antoinette, have been continually at it; all its members have drawn from the vagina of the Austrian Woman…That infectious cavern is the receptacle of all vices, where each comes and takes his required dose.”

And (via):

 “Even during her final imprisonment, she offered her guards the flowing shocking exhibition: With her right hand, the princess de Lamballe foraged her bush, which was often dripping with sweet juices. With her left hand, she masterfully and rhythmically slapped one of the royal buttocks…They saw princess de Lamballe pull a kind of dildo out of her pocket, which she then applied to that spot we take our joy in. It was attached with a wide ribbon, which fitted over her hips most gracefully.”

 

penis marie antoinette

 

James McCammon:

… if we envision the pornography of the last two hundred years as designed solely to titillate and incite sexual feelings, we must view its history before this time as a form of expression that used the shock of sex as an instrument to convey other messages, often censuring political or religious figures, but also directly challenging social and moral conventions.  “Pornography was the name for a cultural battle zone,” wrote Lynn Hunt; quoting the historian Walter Kendrick she continued, “’pornography’ names an argument, not a thing.” This fact is clearly evident if one examines the basis of government regulation during this era, which was focused on repression of unrest and sedition rather than expurgation of licentious material in the name of public decency.

 

Mademoiselle des Faveurs

Mademoiselle des Faveurs

 

 

Libelle pamphlets were powerful:

Though it was during the Revolution itself, and directly preceding it, that the largest effusion of political pornography was released, between the years of 1787 and 1792 there were important precursors that would later shape the direction of revolutionary erotic libel.  To be sure, all political elites, be they revolutionary or royalist, got a healthy dose of pornographic censure. But the orientation of this material was aimed disproportionately toward Marie Antoinette. “The avalanche of defamation that overwhelmed her between 1789 and her execution on October 16, 1793, has no parallel in the history of vilification[”, wrote historian Robert Darnton. Perhaps the most shocking evidence of the libel’s widespread dissemination comes from Boyer de Nîmes’s Histoire des caricatures de la révolte des Francais in which Boyer notes that “antiqueen pamphlets were sold at the gate to the Tuileries palace, in its gardens and right under the King’s window.” These rumors of erotic manipulation and debauchery were so vast as to replace the real Marie Antoinette with a ribald fiction where imagined narratives of her private life rode roughshod over any actual movements the Queen might have made.

 

Marie Antoinette with the king’s younger brother, the Count d’Artois, as the king looks on.

Marie Antoinette with the king’s younger brother, the Count d’Artois, as the king looks on.

 

Above is a cartoon from 1789 showing General Lafayette on bended knee fondling the exposed “res publica” of Marie Antoinette. Via

Above is a cartoon from 1789 showing General Lafayette on bended knee fondling the exposed “res publica” of Marie Antoinette. Via

 

 

 

Marie in an orgy. ““Witness the ecstasy of my throes. Gods, so many bosoms excite my tender affection.”

Marie in an orgy. ““Witness the ecstasy of my throes. Gods, so many bosoms excite my tender affection.”

 

Figure 2. Typical lesbian depiction involving Marie Antoinette and the duchess of Pequigny. Louis Binet. From Marie-Jo Bonnet, Les Deux Amies (paris: Éditions Blanche, 200). Accessed at http://sappho.fromthesquare.org/?p=75 Text reads: “With your kisses, excite my desires, I am, my darling, at the height of pleasure.” Via

Typical lesbian depiction involving Marie Antoinette and the duchess of Pequigny. Louis Binet. From Marie-Jo Bonnet, Les Deux Amies (paris: Éditions Blanche, 200). Accessed at 
Text reads: “With your kisses, excite my desires, I am, my darling, at the height of pleasure.” Via

 

libelle

 

  • lili

    French Revolution is a good example of controlling people riots by the way of propaganda. They kill her because they though she was raping her children. Nowadays we know it was fake but they pretend they kill her for other reasons.

    • morito

      You are saying only nonsenses!NO,they DIDN’T KILL HER because “they thought that she was raping her children”,but BECAUSE OF WHAT SHE REPRESENTED,that means the former monarchy,which was hated and despised,and,ate the same time,the counter-revolutionary party who wanted to destroy and suppress the Revolution!It’s true that she was accused at her trial to have had sexual relation with her son(NOT “raping” him and NOT with all her children!),but those accusations were quite quickly dropped as unfounded.And they didn’t pretend “to kill her for other reasons”!The reasons were those that I told above.As for the French Revolution,you are wrong again!The people’s riots weren’t controlled by the propaganda.On the contrary,they were SOMETIMES stimulated by the propaganda(not the sexual one),but,ALMOST ALWAYS,those riots didn’t need propaganda because the reasons that provoked them were MORE THAN JUSTIFIED!

  • J.J. Sefton

    So, okay. A giant penis-horse. Must be where George Lucas stole the Taun-Taun.